reality

In my attempt to primarily only give opinions on my own day-to-day on this blog I feel a little queasy putting this little paragraph about a very timely political conundrum. It was not from a political blog however, it was a philosophy blog. Clearly very different. But I find this paragraph makes an interesting comparison. I also love anything that recognizes the pull and tension between two opposing yet immutable realities.


"This is the rage and anger I hear in the Tea Party movement; it is the sound of jilted lovers furious that the other — the anonymous blob called simply “government” — has suddenly let them down, suddenly made clear that they are dependent and limited beings, suddenly revealed them as vulnerable. And just as in love, the one-sided reminder of dependence is experienced as an injury. All the rhetoric of self-sufficiency, all the grand talk of wanting to be left alone is just the hollow insistence of the bereft lover that she can and will survive without her beloved. However, in political life, unlike love, there are no second marriages; we have only the one partner, and although we can rework our relationship, nothing can remove the actuality of dependence. That is permanent." - J. M. Bernstein, Opinionator (blog), June 13, 2010